Hill

Hill v. Barner

Good Law
1908 Cal. App. LEXIS 62·8 Cal. App. 58·96 P. 111
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 7, 1908Civ. No. 410.California4,315 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

Action to quiet title.

The court below gave plaintiff judgment quieting his title to the land in dispute, and it is from said judgment and the order of the court denying the defendants a new trial that this appeal is taken.

A motion to dismiss the appeal herein was submitted by the respondent, but it is clearly without merit, and, therefore, does not demand extended notice. The motion is denied.

The premises in controversy are described in the complaint as follows: “Lots numbered 1, 2 and 6, situate in that certain block which said block is bounded on the north by the north erly line of what is commonly known as, and called, Short street; on the east by the westerly line of Center street; on the south by the northerly line of Shasta street, and on the west by the easterly line of the right of way of the Central Pacific Railway Company, a corporation, as said lots and said block more fully appear and as the same are designated by and upon the official map of said City of Redding, now on file in the office of the County Recorder of said County of Shasta.”

Another appeal is pending before this court and the same submitted with the case at bar, in which the respondent here is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.