Plocher

Plocher v. Superior Court

Good Law
135 Cal. App. 337·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 298·26 P.2d 841
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 16, 1933Docket No. 4976.California887 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pullen, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition. The original action was brought in the superior court by petitioner Karl Plocher as plaintiff against Dalel Singh for damages to his automobile and loss of use thereof, arising from a collision between an automobile owned and operated by Dalel Singh and a car owned by Karl Plocher. To this complaint Dalel Singh filed an answer and cross-complaint. Karl Plocher, answering the cross-complaint, denied negligence, and upon the issues thus presented the cause proceeded to trial. During the process of the trial it developed that at the time of the accident the car, although the property of Karl Plocher, was then being operated by John Plocher in the absence of Karl Plocher, upon his own business but with the consent of Karl Plocher. Thereupon Dalel Singh, the cross-complainant, asked leave to make John Plocher a party cross-defendant. Permission was granted and to this amended cross-complaint defendants demurred, John Plocher demurring especially, setting up the statute of limitations. In the complaint it was not alleged that plaintiff was operating the automobile at the time of the collision, although in the answer to the original…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.