Coursault

Coursault v. Schwebel

Good Law
118 Cal. App. 259·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 239·5 P.2d 77
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 1931Docket No. 7822.California2,244 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

An appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict of $6,500 in favor of plaintiff and against defendants.

On June 26, 1928, at the intersection of Sacramento and Maple Streets in San Francisco, the plaintiff received personal injuries when he was struck by an automobile owned by defendant Schwebel and operated by defendant Barrett.

As grounds for their appeal defendants claim that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; that the court erred in admitting in evidence a certain ordinance of the city and county of San Francisco and in its instructions to the jury, and that plaintiff’s counsel was guilty of prejudicial misconduct at the trial.

Plaintiff immediately before the accident was a passenger on a street-car traveling west on Sacramento Street. According to some of the witnesses the car stopped on Sacramento Street, its front end, from which plaintiff alighted, being about six feet within the intersection. It was testified by another witness that the car passed into the intersection a distance of about the length of the front platform. There was a conflict as to whether the car stopped before plaintiff alighted, but the testimony was sufficient to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.