Rossi

Rossi v. Ghiotto

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 181·29 Cal. App. 550·156 P. 974
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 3, 1916Civ. No. 1698.California561 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is an appeal in an action on a promissory note from an order vacating a default judgment entered against the defendant Ghiotto.

The showing made on behalf of said defendant in support of the motion to vacate was to the effect that the defendant, a foreigner, spoke the English language imperfectly and could not read or write the same; that he was not a maker of the note, but signed the same only as a witness to the signatures of the real makers; that he had never before been a party to a lawsuit; that prior to the commencement of the action he had several consultations with an agent of the plaintiff who had been intrusted with the collection of the note for the purpose of making a settlement; that during those consultations the agent of the plaintiff always evinced a friendly disposition toward the defendant, and expressed a desire to help the latter in his difficulty over the note. Subsequently, on February 2, 1915, the agent of the plaintiff served the summons and a copy of the complaint in the action upon the defendant; that the defendant was unable to read the same, and he did not know and was not otherwise informed that if he failed to answer the same a default would be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.