Belli

Belli v. Board of Supervisors

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 44·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 887·10 P.2d 793
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 1932Docket No. 8418.California1,135 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Spence, J.

Petitioners herein seek to' review the action of the respondent board in hearing and determining an appeal in a rezoning proceeding.

Petitioners had protested before the city planning commission against the granting of an application to change a piece of property belonging to Mrs. Jennie Jones from the second residential district to the commercial district. The commission took the application under advisement and thereafter failed to act thereon. The charter of the city and county of San Francisco in effect at that time provided that, “The failure of the commission to act within ninety days . . . shall be deemed and be approval of such classification by the commission.” (Art. XVIII, sec. 4, San Francisco City Charter, Stats. 1929, p. 2020.) After the expiration of ninety days an appeal was taken to the respondent board by some of those who had protested against the granting of the application by the commission. Petitioners herein filed their written objections to the hearing of the appeal by the respondent board upon the ground that the approval of the application by the commission resulting under the terms of the charter from the failure of the commission to act was void, as the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.