Williams v. California Milk Producers Ass'n

Good Law
136 Cal. App. 172·28 P.2d 59
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 1934Docket No. 1459.California1,590 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

This is an action for damages for malicious prosecution. The defendant corporation was engaged in the business of retailing milk in the city of San Bernardino and defendant Schnepp was its route foreman. About four months prior to March 3, 1932, the plaintiff entered the milk business in San Bernardino and by personal solicitation obtained some one hundred and forty customers, taking from thirty per cent to forty per cent of them from the defendants. Shortly before 4 o’clock on the morning of March 3, 1932, plaintiff delivered a bottle of milk to one of his customers, picking up five empty milk bottles from the customer’s porch. As he returned to his loaded milk truck the defendant Schnepp, who had been appointed a special deputy sheriff, appeared and arrested him, although the plaintiff told him that he was delivering milk there and had a right to take the bottles. It conclusively appears that it had long been the custom in San Bernardino for all milk dealers to pick up all empty milk bottles as they delivered milk to their customers, regardless of the ownership of the bottles, turning the same in to a bottle exchange where they were sorted and returned to their respective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.