City of Venice v. Superior Court

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 543·36 Cal. App. 757·173 P. 392
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 11, 1918Civ. No. 2662.California303 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

This is a proceeding by which it was sought to prohibit the defendant superior court from proceeding further with the trial of an action entitled Daniel W. Daniels v. City of Venice et al., pending in that court. That action was one in which the plaintiff Daniels sought to obtain a decree of injunction to prevent the city of Venice and its officers from submitting to the electors of the city at the general election to be held therein on the eighth day of April, 1918, a question relating to the prohibition of the sale of alcoholic liquors in that city. *

The defendants having filed their answer to the petition and made.their return to the alternative writ theretofore issued, the matter was submitted for decision on the twenty-ninth day of March, 1918. Later, on that same day, the justices of this court, being of the opinion that the court did not have before it facts sufficient for an appropriate decision upon the merits, ordered that the restraining order theretofore issued in this case be modified to this effect: That the defendants be permitted to make findings of fact in the case of Daniels v. City of Venice et al., and to make an amended return showing the said findings of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.