Brown

Brown v. Lee

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 220·38 Cal. App. 242·175 P. 907
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 1918Civ. No. 2449.California1,060 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff to recover for services rendered. The plaintiff had judgment in the lower court, the defendants appealed therefrom, and have brought up a bill of exceptions containing a part of the evidence. The defendant^ contend that the services rendered, if any, were the services of a trustee, and that no recovery should have been had till the plaintiff rendered to the defendants an account of his stewardship. To ascertain the exact questions piAsented and how they arise, it is necessary to consider the following facts: On February 20, 1908, the Central Trust Company was appointed guardian of the estates of the defendants, who were at that time minor orphans. On May-, 1910, P. J. Foote was appointed guardian of the persons of the defendants. September, 1910, the probate court made a monthly allowance of $75 per month in favor of each minor. Commencing on that date, the plaintiff received for the defendants the allowance money and continued to receive it during the life of the probate order. Both minors attained their majorities October 18, 1911. The Central Trust Company rendered its final account February 19, 1912. The plaintiff thereafter collected…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.