Hanson

Hanson v. Sherman

Good Law
1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 158·25 Cal. App. 169·143 P. 73
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 1914Civ. No. 1352.California2,668 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Frank Pauson, from a judgment entered against him in the sum of $790.50, and from an order denying him a new trial, in an action instituted to determine and enforce his liability as a stockholder for the indebtedness of the Monadnock Brick Company, Incorporated.

The plaintiff’s complaint proceeded upon the theory that the defendant, Pauson, was a stockholder in the corporation at a time when the corporation had made and delivered its two certain promissory notes in the aggregate sum of eleven thousand five hundred dollars to the City and County Bank, plaintiff’s assignor.

The complaint alleged the nonpayment of these notes, and in effect prayed for a judgment against the defendant, as a stockholder of the corporation, for his proportionate share of the unpaid principal and interest due on said notes. The defendant in his answer denied that he was a stockholder in the corporation. The issue thus raised ultimately became the paramount question upon the trial of the. case.

It was an admitted fact in the case that prior to the execution and delivery of the corporation’s notes to plaintiff’s assignor, the corporation, in consideration of a loan of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.