McIntosh

McIntosh v. Hunt

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 141·29 Cal. App. 779·157 P. 839
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1916Civ. No. 1733.California3,213 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiffs’ favor in an action brought by them against the defendant, their father, to have a trust declared in respect to certain real estate conveyed by their mother to him a short time before her death.

The principal contention of the appellant is that the evi- ■ dence is insufficient to sustain the findings- and judgment of the trial court. The record is voluminous, but there are certain facts of vital importance to the determination of this issue concerning which there is no dispute, and which may be briefly set forth as follows: The defendant Clarence M. Hunt and his wife were married about thirty-seven years before the latter’s death. Their life together had been happy, congenial, and mutually confidential during the whole of this period, and no differences or quarrels of any kind had ever arisen between them. Two children had been bom of this marriage—the plaintiffs herein; and these had grown up in the home of their parents, and had in due time married and established themselves in homes of their own, the plaintiff Pearl M. having wedded C. H. McIntosh, a lawyer residing and practicing his profession in the state of Nevada, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.