Huntington Park Improvement Co. v. Superior Court

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 692·1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 201·121 P. 701
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1911Civ. No. 1055.California1,222 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Certiorari. The record transmitted in obedience to the writ issued shows that a certain action brought in the superior court of Los Angeles county, wherein petitioner was plaintiff and the Park Land Company was defendant, was duly and' regularly tried, findings of fact made and judgment rendered for defendant. Petitioner asks that such acts be declared null and void, claiming that the action of the court was in excess of its jurisdiction, for the reason that prior to entering upon the trial thereof, there being no affirmative relief demanded by defendant, petitioner, who was plaintiff in the action, moved the court for a dismissal of the same, which motion was by the court denied. There is nothing whatever in the record showing the making of such motion or ruling. Indeed, petitioner does not claim that such facts are shown by the record. In lieu of such absent record, it presents a transcript of a colloquy occurring at the time between the court and counsel for the respective parties, which it is claimed shows the making of the motion and the adverse ruling had thereon. At the hearing in this court counsel for respondents admitted the correctness of this transcript, but insisted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.