Wrenne

Wrenne v. Huchting

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 626·51 Cal. App. 218·196 P. 295
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 1921Civ. No. 3746.California566 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to change the place of trial of the action from Los Angeles to San Diego County. Respondent has made no appearance in this court.

Defendant served on plaintiff, and, at the time he appeared and filed his demurrer, filed a sufficient affidavit of merits, a proper demand for change of place of trial and a notice of motion for change of venue. In due time he brought the motion on for hearing and it was denied. On the moving papers the defendant was clearly entitled to have the trial of the action changed from the county of Los Angeles, wherein it was brought, to the county of San Diego, in which he resided. No counter-affidavits were filed and no showing was made in opposition to the motion. The record is silent as to the ground upon which the motion was denied. If, as suggested by the appellant in his brief, it was because the demurrer and the moving papers on motion for change of place of trial were filed one day after the expiration of the time limited for the defendant to appear, there was no justification for the court’s action, and we are at a loss to understand its ruling in face of the well-considered decisions of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.