Busset

Busset v. California Builders Co.

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 657·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 968·12 P.2d 36
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 1932Docket No. 7084.California4,510 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Johnson, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff to foreclose a lien claimed for work done by him under a subcontract made March 2, 1928, with M. G. Kendall, operating under the name of the California Builders Co., as the general contractor for the erection of a building for the defendant J. W. Helm, to be used in part for stores and offices, in part for a public garage.

Plaintiff’s contract was for the construction of interior walls; and in connection with their answer the defendants filed a cross-complaint against the plaintiff and Frank M. Clausen, who did the plastering under a subcontract made also with the general contractor and dated October 27, 1927.

After hearing the evidence, the trial court decided that the plaintiff Busset was entitled to a decree of foreclosure of the lien claimed, and that the defendants were not entitled to judgment under their cross-complaint against either Busset or Clausen. In due time a motion for a new trial was made by defendants and cross-complainants, which was denied so far as the motion related to Busset, but was granted as to the cross-defendant Clausen. Thereupon a motion was made immediately on behalf of Clausen to dismiss the action as to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.