Stansbury

Stansbury v. Frazer

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 768·46 Cal. App. 491·189 P. 497
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 10, 1920Civ. No. 2119.California408 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

On the twenty-ninth day of July, 1918, on the application of respondent Hoffman, the superior court of the county of Los Angeles made the following order:

This order was based upon an affidavit of John B. Haas, the attorney for said Hoffman, in which it was stated that a judgment had been rendered in said action against the defendant, James L. Frazer, for $2,332, and that an order was made by said court that certain street bonds in the custody of the county treasurer be delivered to the clerk of said court, and that in pursuance of said order said bonds were so delivered to said clerk, and that they are now held by him, together with the interest coupons attached thereto, and “that said amount is far in excess of the amount necessary to satisfy said judgment against James L. Frazer.

“That the said defendant, Fred Hoffman, has appealed to the Supreme Court from the judgment rendered in the above entitled action and that said appeal is now pending.

“Wherefore, affiant asks that an order be made directing the clerk to deliver to Fred Hoffman bonds in the sum of $1,000.00 and all interest coupons of the bonds now in his control and in his'possession as aforesaid.”

[1] It is quite…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.