Holehan

Thomas D. Campbell & Co. v. Holehan

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 299·48 Cal. App. 568·292 P. 121
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 19, 1920Civ. No. 3432.California1,134 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover five thousand dollars, alleged to be due (less a small credit) as commissions, from defendant Holehan to Charles A. Turner Company, respondent, a five-twelfths interest in which had been assigned to the plaintiff. Because of the declination of Charles A. Turner Company to join as plaintiff, it was made a defendant. It subsequently filed a cross-complaint, concurring in the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint and joining in the prayer for relief against the defendant. Defendant denied the obligation and debt. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and the cross-complainant for their respective shares of four thousand five hundred dollars, from which defendant appeals.

The Charles A. Turner Company attached to its cross-complaint the agreement out of which the alleged right to the commission arose. This contract, entered into between appellant Holehan and the respondent Charles A. Turner Company, recites that, in consideration of the consummation of an exchange of real estate, between Holehan and A. W. Longley, and confirming a verbal agreement theretofore made between the parties, it is agreed that the Charles A. Turner Company shall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.