McNulty

McNulty v. New Richmond Land Co.

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 553·44 Cal. App. 744·187 P. 97
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 1919Civ. No. 2942.California1,954 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the return of money paid under the terms of a contract for the purchase and sale of real property.

Adam Van Prooyen, a resident of Oregon, on the twenty-fifth day of November, 1912, entered into a contract with the New Richmond Land Company, the defendant, wherein he agreed to purchase, and the defendant to sell, two lots of land in the city of Richmond. The purchase price of the property, specified in the contract, was nine hundred dollars, the sum of fifty dollars to be paid on execution and delivery of the contract, the residue to be paid in monthly installments of ten dollars per month, commencing on December 25, 1912, with interest after two years. The buyer further agreed to pay all taxes and assessments levied on the property, and to discharge all liens accruing thereon. Failing to do so, the seller might pay and satisfy the same, the buyer to repay all such amounts, with interest, on demand.

After paying the initial amount, Van Prooyen, at various times, made eleven payments, aggregating three hundred dollars, on account of the principal of the contract, and two payments of interest. He was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.