Scherer

Scherer v. Eidenmuller

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 269·45 Cal. App. 372·187 P. 445
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 31, 1919Civ. No. 2898.California1,743 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of two thousand dollars against him in an action brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for alleged improper surgical and medical treatment administered to the plaintiff by the defendant, a practicing physician of San Francisco. The facts are, stated briefly, that on the twenty-fourth day of April, 1916, plaintiff received a gunshot wound in the right elbow, the bullet passing through the joint and shattering the bones. He was treated at the emergency hospital, where the wound was bandaged, and he returned to his home. During the evening of the same day the pain became very severe and he called the defendant, a physician, who administered a hypodermic to ease the pain. The next morning the defendant directed the plaintiff to go to a hospital for treatment, and while plaintiff was at the hospital defendant examined the wound, had X-ray pictures taken and bandaged the arm again. The arm was badly swollen and inflamed and it was decided that an operation was not advisable until this condition was relieved. On the eleventh day of May, the swelling and inflammation having subsided some, an operation was performed by the defendant,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.