Berry

Berry v. Miami Cycle & Manufacturing Co.

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 648·51 Cal. App. 117·196 P. 94
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 1921Civ. No. 3742.California908 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action wherein the plaintiff sought to recover damages from the defendant for an alleged breach of the warranties of an agreement entered into between the parties, by the terms of which the plaintiff and one F. M. Hodge were made the sole and exclusive agents of the defendant for the sale of a certain type of motorcycle, known as Flying Merkle motorcycle, throughout certain portions of southern California, and by which said agreement, according to the plaintiff’s contention, the defendant warranted said motorcycles to be free from imperfections in the nature of latent defects arising from the process of manufacture, but that a large number of said motorcycles were defective in these respects, and for that reason unmerchantable, to the damage of the plaintiff and said Hodge in a certain sum. Hodge is alleged to have conveyed his right of recovery to the plaintiff prior to the inception of the action. The defendant in its answer denied the averments of the plaintiff’s complaint as to any breach of warranty on, it® part and as to any damage resulting therefrom, and by way of cross-complaint sought to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.