Brigham

Brigham v. Southern Pacific Co.

Good Law
1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 218·2 Cal. App. 522·84 P. 306
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 1905Civ. No. 100.California2,526 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gray, J.

The plaintiff had a verdict for damages in the sum of $2,000 for having been wrongfully ejected from defendant’s train. On defendant’s motion for a new trial, the damages were reduced to $1,000, and on acceptance by plaintiff the new trial was denied. The appeal is by defendant from the order denying a new trial.

The plaintiff in his complaint says that for a long time prior to his injury he had been engaged in mining, mercantile, and brokerage business. Prom his testimony it appears that he was a “traveling man” by occupation, and had, a little less than three months previous to his alleged injury, purchased in New York a first-class round-trip ticket from that point to San Francisco and Los Angeles and return; that he had come out here on that ticket, and on his way had worked the towns from Salt Lake City to San Francisco and down to Los Angeles, “working up trade for a friend of his in iron beds, and establishing agencies for their manufacture on the Western coast.” He had been in Los Angeles some six days, and during that time, according to his own testimony, he had appeared at one or two ticket broker agencies and inquired what unused tickets were selling at, with a view of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.