Ross

Ross v. Burr

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 119·69 Cal. App. 286·230 P. 986
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 1924Civ. No. 4874.California1,182 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action to obtain a decree adjudging that the partnership theretofore existing between him and the defendant had been dissolved and to obtain an accounting. From parts of the last decree entered the plaintiff has appealed.

In September, 1916, the plaintiff and defendant formed a partnership and commenced to deal in laundry machinery. They so continued until the twenty-third day of December, 1920J On that date the plaintiff expressed his will to defendant to dissolve the partnership and served a written notice on him to that effect. Thereafter the plaintiff continued to conduct the business in the usual manner and, in doing so, completed outstanding contracts and endeavored to get, and did get, new business. From the twenty-third day of December, 1920, it does not appear that the defendant attended at the place of business or that he took any part in the conduct and management of the business. In the meantime the plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint on December 24, 1920.

During the trial the court entered several decrees as will herein later appear. The last one was entered August 2, 1922.

By the terms of the decree last mentioned the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.