Mercantile Acceptance Corp. v. Pioneer Credit Indemnity Co.

Good Law
124 Cal. App. 593·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 737·12 P.2d 988
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 1932Docket No. 4526.California1,564 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

The defendants appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in a suit to replevin an automobile which was seized by an officer under a writ of execution. The court found that the plaintiffs were the owners and entitled to the possession of the car, and that the defendants wrongfully and unlawfully took and retained the possession thereof. It is claimed the findings and judgment are not supported by the evidence. This contention must be sustained.

In June, 1929, Norma J. Podva purchased a Nash sedan automobile on a conditional contract for $1185 from the plaintiff Chavalis, who operated an agency for the sale of N'ash machines under the name of New Fruitvale Nash Company, at Oakland. This contract was assigned to the plaintiff Mercantile Acceptance Corporation. This corporation was the registered legal owner of the car. The purchase price had been fully paid, except the sum of $168. The purchaser was the registered owner thereof.

On November 1, 1930, Norma J. Podva executed a bill of sale of the Nash sedan automobile to her mother, Mrs. George Chiflakos, in consideration of an existing indebtedness for money previously advanced for her schooling. November 5th, Mrs.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.