Booth

Booth v. Booth

Good Law
100 Cal. App. 28·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 358·279 P. 458
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 1929Docket No. 6662.California1,567 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burroughs, J.

Plaintiff, Charles Stuart Booth, and defendant, Lola Warrington Booth, are husband and wife. Plaintiff commenced this action for divorce. The defendant asked for separate maintenance. The court denied the divorce and granted the defendant separate maintenance in the sum of $125 per month. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment. He does not complain of the judgment in so far as it denies him a divorce, but only that portion thereof granting the defendant separate maintenance.

The record discloses the following facts: The complaint alleges a cause of action on the ground of extreme cruelty. The answer denies the allegations of cruelty and by a cross-complaint the defendant also alleges extreme cruelty and asks for separate maintenance only. The answer to the cross-complaint denies the alleged cruelty and on the issues thus framed the cause was tried by the court, findings of fact and conclusions of law made and filed, and the judgment complained of was entered. The evidence discloses that the parties are living separate and apart and the conclusion is amply justified from both the evidence and the findings that such separation was without the fault of the defendant. Upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.