Wyman

Wyman v. Hooker

Good Law
1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 137·2 Cal. App. 36·83 P. 79
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1905Civ. No. 59.California1,776 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gray, J.

This is an action to recover the sum of $2,455.66, alleged to be due upon a certain builder’s contract, and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien securing the same. The plaintiff had judgment for $1,665.57, and for costs, and a decree of foreclosure, from all of which, and from an order denying a new trial, the defendant appeals.

The builder’s contract provides that the work shall be done under the direction and to the satisfaction of the architect. It further provides for payments as follows: 1 ‘ $2,000 when walls are up ready to receive the trusses; $2,000 when roof on, copings of wall cemented and rear corrugated iron finished; $2,127.50 when completed and accepted; the final payment of $2,042.50 shall be made thirty-five days after the completion and acceptance of the work.” It was also provided: “That in each case of the said payments a certificate shall be obtained from and signed by said John Parkinson, architect, to the effect that he considers the payment properly due; but no certificate given or payment made under this contract, except the final certificate or final payment, shall be conclusive evidence of the performance of this contract either wholly or in part, and that no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.