Durbin

Durbin v. Hillman

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 28·50 Cal. App. 377·195 P. 442
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 13, 1920Civ. No. 2108.California1,644 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Prewett, J.

The defendant brings this appeal from a judgment rendered against him for the purchase price of personal property at a price in excess of two hundred dollars. The contract was in writing and the actual purchase was effected through the medium of an agent. The authority of this agent was wholly oral. The defendant did not accept any part of the purchased property nor pay any part of the purchase price. He repudiates the sale and disclaims any authority in the agent to represent him. At no time until the hearing on this appeal has he based his action upon the absence of a writing. Every issue in the case has been resolved against the defendant by stipulation of the parties, save that of agency. The attorney for the defendant stated the stipulation as follows: “I would like to state that it is purely a question of agency. That seems to be the only issue in the case.”

The evidence in support of the sale and of the agency was abundantly sufficient to support the verdict if such evidence was competent for that purpose. It was all oral, but it was received without objection. The defendant chose to waive all other defenses and to rest his entire defense upon the single one as to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.