Schaefer

Title Land Co. v. Schaefer

Good Law
41 Cal. App. 294·182 P. 463
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 27, 1919Civ. No. 2657.California666 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment rendered by the court in favor of plaintiff, quieting its title to a certain lot of land described in the complaint, and also from an order of court made denying their motion for a new trial.

No argument is made by appellants urging a reversal of the judgment for any error disclosed, by the judgment-roll. In their brief, however, they insist not only that the evidence is insufficient to support certain findings, but complain of rulings of the court both in admitting and rejecting evidence offered, by reason of which they insist, that the court erred in denying their motion for a new trial. No record is presented upon which the court may review the rulings complained of. The motion .for new trial was made upon a statement the correctness of which is certified by the judge who tried the ease; and while the record shows that defendants’ motion for a new trial was by order of the court denied, it fails to show upon what ground the motion for a new trial was made. For aught that appears to the contrary, it may have been made for anyone or all of the causes specified in subdivisions 1, 2, 3, and 4 of section 657 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.