Olmstead

Olmstead v. Glendora Bank

Good Law
90 Cal. App. 165·265 P. 500
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 1928Docket No. 6157.California902 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Murphey, J.

This is an action in tort brought by the plaintiff; to recover the reasonable value of certain bonds of the aggregate and par value of $3,390, together with interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum as provided in said bonds. It is the contention of the plaintiff that these bonds were converted by defendant to its own use and benefit. Judgment was for the defendant and the plaintiff appeals.

At the time the negotiations and transactions resulting in this litigation were initiated, plaintiff, a widow residing in Glendora, Los Angeles County, was the owner of cash and securities amounting in the aggregate to about $3,500. In the early months of 1922, January or February, the bulk of these funds, being the plaintiff’s capital, were deposited in the First National Bank of Glendora, she having, however, at that time a small account in the Bank of Glendora, the defendant in this action. Being dissatisfied with merely a bank interest return on her capital, the plaintiff consulted one Boye, the cashier of the defendant bank, with regard to investing her funds in more remunerative ventures. Boye suggested real estate loans, to which the plaintiff demurred, being desirous of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.