Wessinger.

Wayman Investment Co. v. Wessinger

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 108·1910 Cal. App. LEXIS 219·108 P. 1022
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 30, 1910Civ. No. 714.California992 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $300, rental for certain premises leased by plaintiff to defendants by a written lease.

The lease was executed in September, 1906, and the defendants entered into possession of the demised premises, and have ever since continued in possession, but refuse to pay the agreed rental falling due ■ March 12, 1908, solely upon the ground that the building which they leased and the possession of which they have enjoyed, and apparently still retain, was erected in violation of the provision of the ordinance establishing fire limits and regulating the construction of buildings.

It is contended by appellant that because the erection of the building was a violation of such ordinance punishable by a fine, the consideration for the contract of lease between plaintiff and defendants was illegal, and the contract in consequence void.

That a contract founded upon an illegal consideration, or having for its purpose a violation of the law, is void, and may not be enforced, cannot be denied. Such are the cases cited by appellant. But to the proposition that the leasing and giving possession of a building, originally illegally constructed,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.