City of Marysville v. County of Yuba

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 628·1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 171·82 P. 975
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 1905No. 49.California1,787 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

Action to recover back certain moneys collected on fines imposed by the police judge of the police court of plaintiff and alleged to have been paid over to defendant for the use and benefit of plaintiff.

Defendant demurred to the complaint for insufficiency of facts, and the court sustained the demurrer on this ground alone. Other grounds are stated in the demurrer, but as they are not mentioned in respondent’s brief, they will not be noticed. Plaintiff failing to amend its complaint, judgment passed for defendant and plaintiff appeals.

It was alleged in the complaint that there existed in plaintiff city a police court presided over by a police judge who had exclusive jurisdiction over municipal misdemeanors committed within the corporate limits of the city; and that he had jurisdiction, concurrently with the justice of the peace, over such offenses under state laws as were within the jurisdiction of the justice court for the judicial township of which the city formed a part. There are two counts in the complaint :—

Claims were duly presented by plaintiff to defendant through the board of supervisors for the amounts thus coming into defendant’s possession, and were rejected,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.