Bowman

Bowman v. Bowman

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 762·97 Cal. App. 613·275 P. 1023
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 1929Docket No. 3730.California4,791 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McDANIEL, J.

This appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll alone. Frances C. Bowman, as plaintiff, sued the defendants for annulment of the marriage of defendants Horace D. Bowman and Bryan Houston Bowman. The defendant Horace D. Bowman entered his voluntary appearance in the action, and by his answer admitted each and every of the allegations of the complaint herein and waived notice of the time of trial.

The defendant Bryan Houston Bowman answered with appropriate denials the averments of the complaint and set up in separate counts certain affirmative defenses. She also filed a cross-complaint, making both the plaintiff, Frances C. Bowman, and the defendant Horace D. Bowman cross-defendants. They duly answered the cross-complaint. Each of them filed an answer to the cross-complaint.

The court made findings of fact, conclusions of law and entered judgment in favor of plaintiff, vacating, annulling and setting aside the marriage of Horace D. Bowman and Bryan Houston Bowman, which was duly solemnized April 21, 1925; denying the application of Bryan Houston Bowman, the cross-complainant for relief. Judgment was entered December 31, 1926.

The appeal presents the question as to whether…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.