Pike

Bank of South San Francisco v. Pike

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 288·53 Cal. App. 530·200 P. 754
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 1921Civ. No. 3811.California1,280 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

This is an appeal by Boaz D. Pike, Georgie S. Pike, and Edna Laura Pike from the judgment rendered in the case of the Bank of South San Francisco, a Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Edna Laura Pike, et al., Defendants, Henry S. Bridge and Carrie E. Bridge, Defendants and Respondents, ante, p. 524, [ 200 Pac. 752 ]. By stipulation of the parties the appeal is supported by, and rests on, the same record as in the Bridge case. The defendants Pike appeared and answered the plaintiff’s complaint; a trial on the merits was had; and the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against these defendants and they have appealed from the judgment, and which judgment will hereinafter be termed the second judgment. The plaintiff alleged, and the trial court found, that on the twenty-third day of May, 1912, this plaintiff, the Bank of South San Francisco, obtained judgment against certain defendants, including the defendants B. D. Pike and Georgie S. Pike, for the sum of $5,714.31, and which judgment will hereinafter be termed the first judgment. The appellants make the claim that the first judgment was void because the summons was never served on the defendant Georgie…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.