Woolley

Woolley v. Batchelder

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 362·35 Cal. App. 177·169 P. 408
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 30, 1917Civ. No. 2083.California1,718 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action brought to recover a real estate agent’s commission.

The facts of the case are in the main undisputed, and are these: The property involved in the transaction out of which the plaintiff claims his right to a commission to have arisen is a mining property known as the Rising Hope mine. Many years ago the mine was located by three persons named MeCrellish; Hamilton, and Batchelder, the title to the property being taken in the name of McCrellish alone, and upon his death it was distributed to his widow, Mary P. McCrellish, and stood in her name until her death in the year 1911. It is conceded, however, that Hamilton and Batchelder, the associates of MeCrellish, had at all times each a one-fifth interest in the mine, which in course of time descended to Mrs. Batchelder and Mrs. Hamilton, the defendants herein. l([cCrellish in his lifetime owned, and his widow succeeded to, a three-fifths interest in the mine. Efforts were made from time to time to sell the mine but without success, until finally in the year 1910 Mrs. MeCrellish, through the aid and services of the plaintiff in this action—who, however, was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.