Faylor

Faylor v. Great Eastern Quicksilver Mining Co.

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 299·45 Cal. App. 194·187 P. 101
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 1919Civ. No. 2963.California2,891 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beaslt, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment against it based upon an adverse verdict of a jury in an action for the death of John Richard Faylor, a minor. The action is prosecuted by the boy’s father. The verdict was for five thousand five hundred dollars, and on motion for a new trial the court indicated its intention to grant the motion unless the plaintiff should agree to a reduction of the verdict to the sum of $4,250. This condition was met by plaintiff and the motion for a new trial was accordingly denied. The facts are stated in the opening brief of appellant’s counsel as follows:

For more than thirty years the defendant has operated a quicksilver mine about three miles from Guerneville, in Sonoma County. The mining property was part of a large tract of land and was inclosed with a barbed wire fence. A public road passed near the property, and a large gate in defendant’s fence permits travel between defendant’s property and the county road. This fence and gate are about twenty-five feet from the county road. Posted in a conspicuous place on said gate was a sign six feet long and eighteen inches wide, and with the word “Danger” painted thereon in letters one foot…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.