Petersen

Petersen v. Civil Service Board

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 313·68 Cal. App. 752·230 P. 196
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 1924Civ. No. 4811.California1,102 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

Motion by respondents for an order to recall the remittitur issued herein on June 30, 1924, and to strike therefrom the words “the appellant to recover costs of this appeal.”

The appellant Walter J. Petersen commenced this proceeding in certiorari in the superior court of Alameda County for the purpose of having reviewed and annulled certain proceedings of the Civil Service Board of the city of Oakland in regard to the reinstatement of the appellant as a member of the Oakland police department. After issue was joined and a trial had upon the merits, the trial court confirmed the order of the said Civil Service Board, dismissed said writ of review, and allowed respondents their costs. Petersen appealed from the judgment of said trial court and on April 30, 1924, said judgment was reversed. (Petersen v. Civil Service Board, 67 Cal. App. 70 [ 227 Pac. 238 ].)

.The respondents then petitioned for a hearing before the supreme court and their petition was denied on June 26, 1924. (Petersen v. Civil Service Board, supra.) Thereafter, and on June 30, 1924, the remittitur was issued by the clerk of this court and filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court on July 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.