Deshields

Cotton-Macauley Co. v. Deshields

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 244·52 Cal. App. 469·198 P. 1026
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 1921Civ. No. 2298.California1,093 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

On the third day of December, 1920, a judgment was entered in the superior court of Tehama County for the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandate, to be directed to the defendant Deshields, auditor of the county of Tehama, commanding him to forthwith draw and deliver to the plaintiff a warrant for. the payment of a claim against said county, in favor of the plaintiff, theretofore allowed by the board of supervisors, for building a certain bridge in said county. On the same day, the defendant Deshields and the intervener, Daniel B. Luten, who had been allowed to intervene in said action, claiming said moneys as due him from the plaintiff, and who had served a stop notice on the defendant Deshields under the provisions of sections 1183 and 1184 of the Code of Civil Procedure, served and filed their notice of appeal from the judgment and order of said court entered as above stated. Pursuant to the constitution of this state, the hearing and determination of said appeal has been transferred to this court. The matter is now before this court upon motion of the defendant Deshields to dismiss the appeal so far as it relates to himself. This motion is contested by the intervener, who is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.