Needham

Needham v. Sisters of Mercy

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 62·59 Cal. App. 341·210 P. 830
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 1922Civ. No. 4096.California1,245 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Plaintiff sued as assignee of Owen McHugh upon two counts, one to recover the amount remaining due for work completed under an express written contract and under a subsequent oral contract, and another upon a quantum meruit for the work done. The trial court found in accordance with the evidence that the work was performed in compliance with the terms of the contracts and that the sum of $6,088.50 agreed to be paid under the contracts had not been paid. Judgment in that sum and interest from November 11, 1908, was awarded to the plaintiff.

While not conceding the correctness of the finding of the trial court as to the amount due under the contracts (though as to this it must be said there is no room for doubt), the defendant set up four defenses to payment: (1) That a certificate was not obtained from the architect showing that the contractor was entitled to the money sued for and that such a certificate was required by the written contract; (2) that Owen McHugh, by express agreement made with the defendant through its architect and its president, agreed to accept the sum of $7,000 as a full and final payment in respect to the matters then pending between them, and that in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.