Thompson

Thompson v. Purdy

Good Law
117 Cal. App. 565·4 P.2d 282
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 20, 1931Docket Nos. 6829, 6852.California560 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

York, J.

—These twoappeals, which have been consolidated for hearing and decision, are appeals from the judgment in an action for the recovery of damages, brought against H. E. Purdy, a licensed real estate broker, and the surety on his bond, for alleged false representations made to the plaintiffs in a transaction between them and the said Purdy, it being alleged that the plaintiffs signed an agreement for the sale of real estate in the office of the said Purdy, without any allegation as to whether the said Purdy was acting as a broker or as a principal.

Both appeals are taken on the grounds that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the findings of fact do not support the conclusions of law or the judgment.

There is a failure in the complaint to allege any facts which would show a violation of law on the part of Purdy, or facts which would show liability on the part of the surety company under its statutory bond, which bond was conditioned for the faithful performance by defendant Purdy of his undertaking as a licensed real estate broker; this may have been attempted by the allegation in the complaint, “That in making the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.