Kanouse

Kanouse v. Brand

Good Law
11 Cal. App. 669·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 94·106 P. 120
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 1909Civ. No. 690.California1,577 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

This is an action to recover from the sureties on an undertaking given to procure the release of property levied upon under a writ of attachment.

It is alleged in the complaint that one H. J. Stocker, being indebted to the plaintiff, the latter, in June, 1907, brought suit to recover thereon, and procured to -be issued therein a writ of attachment under which certain property of Stocker, situated in Los Angeles and Ventura counties, was attached by the sheriffs of said counties; that thereafter, in consideration of the release of said property so attached, the defendants herein as sureties made and executed to plaintiff an undertaking in consideration of which the property so held by the sheriffs under and by virtue of said writ of attachment was released therefrom by this plaintiff.

This undertaking, which is set out in the complaint, after reciting the commencement of the action by plaintiff against Stocker, the issuance of the writ of attachment, and that the sheriff of Los Angeles county had, by virtue thereof, attached certain property of Stocker which the latter desired to have released therefrom, provides: ‘1 Now, therefore, we, the undersigned, residents and freeholders…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.