Havens

Havens v. Foskett

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 872·81 Cal. App. 653·254 P. 642
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 9, 1927Docket No. 2994.California1,399 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee of Central Finance Company, a corporation, brought this action to recover the amount of six trade acceptances drawn by J. B. Vallen, doing business as Cadillac Manufacturing Company, upon defendants and duly accepted by them. They are all of one series, dated February 2, 1923, and payable 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, and 90 days respectively after date. They are all identical in amount and in terms except as to time of payment. The first one of the series reads as follows:

All of these acceptances were sold to the Central Finance Company February 6, 1923, for a valuable consideration. They were indorsed on the back thereof, “Cadillac Mfg. Co. by J. B. Vallen Mgr. Demand, notice nonpayment and protest hereby waived. Cadillac Mfg. Co. By J. B. Vallen, Mgr.” All of the instruments, after the maturity thereof, were assigned by the Central Finance Company to the plaintiff for collection. Vallen procured the instruments through fraud and the goods in payment for which they were given were never delivered. The court found:

Judgment was entered in favor of the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed therefrom.

Respondents contend that the fact that the trade…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.