Riecks

Murphy v. Riecks

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 99·40 Cal. App. 1·180 P. 15
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 1919Civ. No. 1948.California2,792 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The appeal is by defendant, Lulu Mignon Murphy, from a judgment, entered in the superior court of the county of San Joaquin, restraining defendants from selling, by virtue of a certain writ of execution, at sheriff’s sale or otherwise, certain real property of plaintiff.

The defendant, Riecks, as sheriff, filed an answer and disclaimer and upon the trial was permitted to withdraw from the case. The real parties to the action, therefore, are the plaintiff and Lulu Mignon Murphy, who will hereinafter be referred to as the defendant and appellant.

Prior to the thirteenth day of October, 1908, S. S. Murphy was the owner of the property sought to be sold by virtue of said writ of execution. On said day, by deed of gift, he conveyed said property to his wife, Alice K. Murphy, plaintiff herein, which deed was duly recorded on August 5, 1911, since which time the property has stood in the name of plaintiff.

Appellant is the daughter of said S.. S. Murphy by a former wife. On the thirteenth day of March, 1911, she instituted an action (No. 9896) against her father. It was alleged in the complaint that plaintiff was a poor person, afflicted with disease and unable to work to support…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.