Chase

Chase v. Blair

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 744·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 723·288 P. 681
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 1930Docket No. 213.California703 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cary, J.

The defendant Alfred G. Blair appeals from a default judgment rendered against him.

Plaintiffs brought this action to specifically enforce a contract between plaintiffs as vendees and the defendant Blair as the vendor for the purchase of certain real property. Defendant First National Bank of Oceanside was made a party because it held in escrow the contract and deed involved. Defendant bank filed its answer denying the allegations of the complaint, and upon application to the court secured an order apparently under Code of Civil Procedure, section 386, substituting appellant Alfred Q. Blair (already a party defendant) and Susie A. Blair, his wife, as defendants in place of the bank, upon condition that the bank deliver to the court the documents held in escrow. This being done, a further order was entered discharging the bank from all liability to the parties. Defendant Alfred G. Blair having failed to answer the summons issued on the original complaint, a judgment was rendered against him for a small amount of money and also directing the clerk to deliver to plaintiffs the documents theretofore surrendered by the bank. No judgment was rendered against the substituted defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.