Maskuns

Maskuns v. Maskuns

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 737·93 Cal. App. 27·268 P. 1093
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 1928Docket No. 3528.California1,262 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment determining that an undivided one-half interest in a certain Los Angeles lot is the community property of the appellant and respondent, who are husband and wife.

These litigants intermarried January 12, 1907, and lived as husband and wife until the commencement of this action. In June, 1906, appellant contracted to purchase lot 3 of Vermont Place, in Los Angeles, for the sum of $1,400, one-half of which purchase price he paid prior to his marriage with respondent. The balance was paid after the marriage. A deed of conveyance to this lot was executed and delivered to the appellant July 18, 1908. The appellant was a tailor by occupation, and both before and after their marriage the respondent worked in his shop for wages. Prior to their marriage the appellant possessed $600 separate funds, together with some real property. The respondent also had $160 of her own separate money which she delivered to her husband. After their marriage both spouses mingled their separate funds and community earnings in a bank account, which was carried in the appellant’s name. After their marriage, upon different occasions, appellant drew upon this community fund to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.