Couts

Couts v. Sperry Flour Co.

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 353·85 Cal. App. 156·259 P. 108
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 18, 1927Docket No. 5493.California1,681 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

Action for damages for breach of warranty. The allegations of the complaint, in so far as they are necessary for a discussion of the question here involved, recite in substance that on or about the fourteenth day of December, 1922, plaintiffs called upon defendant company with the object of purchasing from it certain seed barley to be used for planting, and defendant thereupon sold the same to them. That prior to such sale defendant represented and warranted that the seed so purchased was a lot of fine San Joaquin grown barley that yielded twenty-five or thirty sacks to the acre, and further represented that it was not Mariout barley, a variety plaintiffs did not desire to purchase. That plaintiffs relied solely upon each of the representations so made in completing the purchase. That acting upon such reliance they planted the same, which in due course grew and matured, at which time it was revealed that the same was Mariout barley. That in consequence plaintiffs’ yield was a smaller one than would have been produced with the variety ordered. Damages were prayed for in the sum of $3,150.50. Defendant answering, denied that the barley was sold as seed barley or- that any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.