Rosenstein

Sun Realty Co. v. Rosenstein

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 484·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 366·290 P. 1053
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1930Docket No. 6052.California1,069 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Gates, J.

On or about January 27, 1926, the respondent Sun Realty Company obtained judgment against the respondents Charles Rosenstein, James J. Wade and Catherine Wade and appellants for the sum of $1172.46, interest and costs. The judgment, which was joint and several, was obtained in a suit wherein the respondent corporation sued respondents Rosenstein and Wade, joining appellants, who were subtenants. On July 30, 1926, respondent Sun Realty Company assigned the judgment to Rose Rosenstein. On the same day, for a valuable consideration, the latter released defendant and respondent Charles Rosenstein from any and all liability. A marginal note was made by the clerk that the judgment was satisfied as to the respondent Charles Rosenstein. On the same day a partial release of certain realty from the judgment was indorsed on the margin of the judgment. On November 10, 1926, Rose Rosenstein assigned the judgment to Samuel Ginsberg. On December 11, 1926, the latter in turn assigned the judgment to respondent Charles Rosenstein and respondent Catherine Wade. These assignments and each of them recite that they are for a valuable consideration. On January 10, 1927, respondents Rosenstein and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.