Millsap

People v. Millsap

Caution
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 457·85 Cal. App. 732·260 P. 378
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 1, 1927Docket No. 1463.California4,343 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

— Defendant was tried and convicted upon an indictment charging perjury and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. By demurrer to the indictment and also by motion in arrest of judgment he raised the point that the indictment does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense. The act charged as perjury was the verification of an answer in a civil action. The indictment set up in full the complaint in that action and the answer thereto. The complaint was filed in the superior court of Los Angeles County on June 22, 1922, by Ida A. Morgan Clark, as plaintiff, against Homer C. Millsap, the appellant in this case, Berenice Williams Millsap, and M. M. Investment Company, a corporation, as defendants, for the purpose of obtaining an accounting from the defendants. The indictment alleged that this complaint was verified by the plaintiff and that an answer thereto was filed on July 25, 1922, in behalf of Berenice Williams Millsap and Homer C. Millsap, individually and as trustee for M. M. Investment Company, which was verified on the same day by Homer C. Millsap. This verification is the perjury charged.

In support of his contention…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.