Singh

This is an appeal from a judgment for $16,000 against the defendants P. B. Cross, Joseph Carlson, Alden Anderson, and Howard M. Payne, in an action to recover damages alleged to have been caused to plaintiffs by reason of the breach by said defendants of an agreement for the leasing of a tract of land containing over 1,200 acres, in the county of Colusa, state of California.

The lease involved here is identical in many respects with the one considered by this court in the opinion filed this day in the case of Chanan Singh et al. v. Cross et al., ante, p. 309 [ 212 Pac. 916 ]. The points of difference between the two leases being that in the present case the lease was dated February 2d, while in the Chanan Singh case it was dated April 5, 1918, and under the lease in the present case, water was to be supplied by defendants by April 15th, while in the Chanan Singh lease it was agreed that it should he supplied by April 25, 1918.

The evidence in the instant case is substantially the same in all essential particulars as that offered in the case of Chanan Singh et al. v. Cross et al., supra, and the findings in the two cases are substantially the same. Under such circumstances it is…