Felton Water Co. v. Superior Court

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 665·82 Cal. App. 382·256 P. 255
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 18, 1927Docket No. 5840.California2,023 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cashin, J.

— An application for a writ of prohibition to arrest further proceedings in respondent court on an order requiring petitioner to show cause why it should not be restrained pending the trial of an action filed therein from further obstructing the flow and diverting the waters of a stream.

Petitioner, a corporation, was organized in 1889 for the purpose of supplying the inhabitants of the town of Felton and its vicinity with water for domestic and other uses. An action was filed in August, 1926, by petitioner in respondent court against Forest Lakes Mutual Water Company, Seminary Avenue Land Company, Santa Cruz Land Title Company, corporations, George H. Fetherston, and others to condemn an easement, to wit, the right to take, divert, and carry away as against the lands of defendants 150,000 gallons of water per day from Limestone Brook, which is a branch of a stream called Gold Gulch in Santa Cruz County, with the right to sell the same to the general public and to the inhabitants of the town of Felton for domestic and other uses at such rentals and charges as are fixed by the railroad commission of the state of California. The complaint alleges that at all the times since the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.