Holmgren

Holmgren v. Madalena

Caution
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 128·49 Cal. App. 136·192 P. 867
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 1920Civ. No. 2123.California342 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nicol, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff upon the judgment-roll alone from a judgment in favor of defendant.

The action grew out of an alleged assault on plaintiff by defendant, as the result of which he lost the sight of his right eye. The case was tried before the superior court of the county of Plumas, with a jury, and the trial culminated in a verdict for the defendant.

The complaint alleges that the defendant wrongfully and unlawfully committed an assault upon the person of plaintiff and wrongfully in the commission of such assault struck plaintiff in the right eye and thereby destroyed the sight of said eye and rendered plaintiff permanently blind in said eye to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of four thousand dollars; that by reason of said assault and injury committed as aforesaid plaintiff has incurred an indebtedness of three hundred dollars for and on account of medical attention and treatment; that the said assault was wrongful, unlawful, violent, and malicious. Plaintiff demanded judgment for the above-mentioned items, together with the sum of two thousand dollars for exemplary damages and costs of suit.

A demurrer to the complaint having been overruled, the defendant answered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.