Bourne

Bourne v. Root

Good Law
125 Cal. App. 461·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 697·13 P.2d 1066
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 1932Docket No. 729.California1,131 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Scovel, J.

The complaint in this action sets up a promissory note executed by defendants to plaintiff alleges nonpayment of the same and prays for judgment thereon. Defendants’ answer admitted liability on the note. Defendants filed a cross-complaint upon a quantum meruit for services rendered to the plaintiff and the Yosemite Portland Cement Company. The Yosemite Portland Cement Company was made a party to the action upon the filing of the cross-complaint and both cross-defendants filed an answer thereto in the nature of a general denial. At the trial of the matter it was stipulated that judgment might be entered in favor of plaintiff in an agreed amount upon the complaint, the trial proceeding upon the cross-complaint.

It appears from the transcript that the plaintiff was a director and the treasurer of the Yosemite Portland Cement Company, a corporation. A conversation in regard to the sale of cement by the corporation was had between plaintiff and defendant, Alfred C. Boot. According to plaintiff the conversation merely related to business being done by the company and its prospects for future sales. He denied ever having made an agreement with defendant employing him to make sales of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.