Rhodes

Rhodes v. Bush

Good Law
121 Cal. App. 137·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1183·8 P.2d 542
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 1932Docket No. 628.California2,394 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jennings, J.

This appeal is from a judgment refusing to impose a personal liability upon respondents and refusing to declare and enforce a vendor’s lien upon certain real property.

Concerning the facts of the case there is, with one exception which will hereinafter be noted, no material dispute. On April 12, 1923, Guiseppe and Emilia Yalpreda entered into a written contract with Otis and Ida Vestal wherein the former agreed to convey to the latter the real property which plaintiffs sought by this action to impress with a vendor’s lien. The consideration for the conveyance was stated to be $16,627.50, of which sum $3,000 was paid at the time the contract was executed and the balance was to be paid in annual installments of $2,725.50, with interest at the rate of seven per cent. Title was to remain in the sellers until payment of the entire purchase price was completed. On April 30, 1925, Irwin S. Burgess entered into a written contract with the Vestals, whereby he agreed to purchase from the Vestals their interest in the property which they had agreed to buy .from the Valpredas for the sum of $5,715.50, to be paid in installments. The Vestals thereupon, on said date, executed a written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.