Hunt

Hunt v. Continental National Bank

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 711·45 Cal. App. 578·188 P. 300
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 1920Civ. No. 3174.California1,692 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of certain defendants in an action in interpleader brought by the plaintiff, as county treasurer of Los Angeles County, to determine certain conflicting claims to certain bonds issued by the said treasurer under the provisions of the Road District Improvement Act of 1907.

The facts out of which the controversy arose are undisputed and are briefly these: The supervisors of the county of Los Angeles undertook the construction of a road therein under the provisions of the Road District Improvement Act of 1907. (Stats. 1907, p. 806.) The contract was regularly let to a contractor and the work completed thereunder and duly accepted by said board, and the bonds provided in said act to be issued in payment for such work were duly issued by the said treasurer of the county as required by the terms of said act. In the meantime and after the execution of the contract and prior to the completion of the work the contractor, in consideration of money advanced to Mm by the Continental National Bank to enable him to prosecute such work and as security for such advances, assigned to the said Continental National Bank his said contract and his rights…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.